Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 May 2008 23:27:45 -0400
From:      Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bsnmpd hrProcessorLoad results incorrect on FreeBSD 7 or 8?
Message-ID:  <482121B1.7080901@jellydonut.org>
In-Reply-To: <200805070149.m471nToM073813@lava.sentex.ca>
References:  <4820FE0F.9050808@jellydonut.org> <200805070149.m471nToM073813@lava.sentex.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 08:55 PM 5/6/2008, Michael Proto wrote:
>> Is anyone seeing problems with bsnmpd reporting an incorrect
>> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad value under HEAD? I'm using the
>> default /etc/snmpd.config settings and am loading the
>> /usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so library just as I do in 6.3, but the value for
>> this MIB always reports CPU utilization at 100% regardless of the actual
>> load on the system. 6.3 and 6-STABLE both work correctly and report the
>> actual CPU utilization when queried.
>
> IIRC, I noticed this when I changed to ULE from 4BSD_SCHED.
>
>         ---Mike
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Would match my environment as well, as I'm using ULE on all of the
affected systems. Just built a 4BSD kernel on my HEAD system and
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad reports a correct value again.

Anyone have an idea on a fix?


Thanks,
Proto



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?482121B1.7080901>