Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 15:31:29 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: evolution-datas-server fails configure due to Kerberos changes Message-ID: <op.uaygmrmn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20080510201925.7770E4500E@ptavv.es.net> References: <20080510201925.7770E4500E@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 May 2008 15:19:25 -0500, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote= : >> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 15:04:00 -0500 >> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> >> Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org >> >> On Sat, 10 May 2008 01:37:13 -0500, Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com= > >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > After the recent Heimdal import (and Doug Rabson's quick fix regard= ing >> > the krb5-config script) on 8.0-CURRENT, i now noticed >> > evolution-dataserver fails its configure stage due to problems in i= ts >> > detection of Kerberos support. >> > >> > configure:28051: checking for Kerberos 5 >> > configure:28079: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -march=3Dathlon64 >> > -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/db41= >> > -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -L/usr/lib -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err >> > -lgssapi_krb5 conftest.c >&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lk5crypto >> > >> > >> > When one looks further in config.log one notices loads of missing >> > hx509_* symbols. That's where i noticed that the link line above wa= s >> > missing the -lhx509 that was added to "krb5-config --libs". >> > >> > This leads me to believe the evolution-data-server port uses its ow= n >> > home-grown Kerberos 5 configure check instead of depending on >> > krb5-config. >> >> Yep. >> >> > I'll happily test suggested patches. >> >> Try here: = >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/evolution-data-server.diff > > Just in case you don't follow freebsd-current@, Doug R. has checked in= > fixes for MOST of the problems from the update of heimdal in > current. These may fix the problems, but he says that he won't have it= > all fixed until tomorrow. (A test patch for the last problem has been > posted, though, if you just can't wait.) > > In any case, it's probably not worth spending too much time fixing > failing ports when they won't be broken long for those willing to upda= te > heimdal. I do follow up in the current@, this problem is different. dfr (Doug) = already has committed fix, but it's unrelated with this. Even thought if= = dfr believes that this is also another bug and going to do another commi= t, = I still would like to see my patch goes in to get e-d-s to use krb5-conf= ig = instead of hardcore. Cheers, Mezz -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.uaygmrmn9aq2h7>