Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:27:02 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@teledomenet.gr> Subject: Re: Routing to internet addresses ending with 255 Message-ID: <482D6F86.7050909@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <20080516131443.W19365@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <482D54B3.3060306@otenet.gr> <200805161314.22978.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20080516125422.Q19201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <482D6937.10906@otenet.gr> <20080516131443.W19365@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> i don't think it's freebsd version dependent, unless developers made >>> a bug. >>> >>> >> all these systems are behind ADSL routers and use NAT. Their internal >> addresses are in the 192.168.0.X range. >> I could easily consider this a problem of the (cheap) ADSL routers, >> but 6 > > very likely. yesterday i configured chinese 5 WLAN/LAN switch/routers, > it looks like it's software was written by someone during single lunch > break ;) > > i found 2 bugs not even searching much. but - as just a LAN/WLAN > bridges they work fine. I too, am very well aware of the "quality" of these systems :) > >> and 7 use the same model (OTOH, there may be different firmware >> versions). > > but WHAT are external IP's of these routers. this is important. > > if the "problem" host is A.B.C.255 check if routers external IP isn't > A.B.C.something No, I just checked again with DynDNS update logs and all three routers had very different IP addresses at the time I was trying.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?482D6F86.7050909>