Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 May 2008 23:25:54 +0400 (MSD)
From:      Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com>
To:        Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805212322350.6580@ora.chd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080521174200.GA15241@freebsd.org>
References:  <200805191106.m4JB6oBF011533@freefall.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805210101470.4552@ora.chd.net> <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805211216580.5183@ora.chd.net> <20080521174200.GA15241@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Roman Divacky wrote:

> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:39:01PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> 
>> >On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:09:17AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
>> >>On Mon, 19 May 2008, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Current FreeBSD problem reports
>> >>>Critical problems
>> >>>Serious problems
>> >>>
>> >>>S Tracker      Resp.      Description
>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>o kern/21463   emulation  [linux] Linux compatability mode should not 
>> >>>allow setu
>> >>>o kern/97326   emulation  [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux 
>> >>>emulation
>> >>>o kern/117010  emulation  [linux] linux_getdents() get something like 
>> >>>buffer ove
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>about 117010...
>> >>Can somebody test this patch on amd64 and i386?
>> >>It is necessary linux_base-f8, 2.6.16, -current.
>> >
>> >can you describe the idea behind the patch? why do you think
>> >it's correct to replace fcntl64 with fcntl args?
>> >
>> 
>> this diff from linux64 port, therefore in it a lot of not concerning 
>> to getdents(), but it will not prevent test
>> 
>> fcntl64 with fcntl have identical args in linux, but linux x86-64 has 
>> no fcntl64 syscall
>> 
>> to getdents concerns only changes of ino member of struct l_dirent,
>> essence in that i too had problem with getdents. and i have not 
>> understood after what changes it have worked correctly. it disturbs me.
>
> so.. you are saying that you dont know why but it fixes the problem for
> you. right?

ugu, i don't know what fixed the problem, it disturbs me )

>
> btw.. your git repo seems to be down

ups... firewall, now all ok. sorry, i have forgotten about it.

-- 
Have fun!
chd



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.10.0805212322350.6580>