Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:16:20 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Paul <bsdlist@cogeco.ca> Subject: Re: Areca Raid 6 ARC-1231 Raid 6 Slow LS Listing Performance on large directory Message-ID: <200806121116.21657.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200806112026.m5BKQaOB074653@lava.sentex.ca> References: <20080611173211.A899C1E9E@fep5.cogeco.net> <20080611200342.A53901DEF@fep1.cogeco.net> <200806112026.m5BKQaOB074653@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3634284.SzPfiIiOag Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 04:04 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote: > >Changing from compat to files fixes the problem. > > > >It is now superfast when running ls -lh. > > Hi, > Not sure, but a more "proper" fix might be to look at the > nscd caching daemon. Take a look at nscd and nscd.conf. I havent used > it myself, but I seem to recall others suggesting this as a "fix" as > well. Why is 'compat' so slow? (ie what's the difference between it and file=20 anyway) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart3634284.SzPfiIiOag Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBIUH/t5ZPcIHs/zowRAkUrAJ9uqCqTgPoJJ6hv8WBu1eqNSRf2bwCgjSmG X7jjUsDRyNj3PtvXwzHGf/8= =er3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3634284.SzPfiIiOag--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200806121116.21657.doconnor>