Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:57:31 -0700 From: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who should honor WITHOUT_X11? Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0806191857t7dc65d5dkb7f24c776b925f32@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080619191156.00e517f6@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <7d6fde3d0806190836u2f0f96d6i75b3fc1b4edd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <20080619191156.00e517f6@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Gary Jennejohn
<gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:36:56 -0700
> "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Trying to build dbus recently on my system without X11 installed, I
>> ran into a few compile issues because I had put WITHOUT_X11=yes into
>> src.conf. However, I put WITHOUT_X11=yes into make.conf and was able
>> to compile dbus properly (in the end).
>>
>> So, my questions are:
>> 1. Should make.conf be responsible for the WITHOUT_X11 or should
>> another file be responsible for it?
>> 2. Is it already documented in a manpage somewhere? It isn't
>> documented in `man make.conf'.
>>
>
> It's documented in src.conf(5) that it only applies to the FreeBSD
> source tree, which does not include the ports tree. Only make.conf
> is globally applicable.
Thanks for the replies. Just thought I'd check :).
Should a /etc/{pkg,ports}.conf file be created to help segregate
setting these variables, or is this already done somewhere else
(pkgtools.conf)?
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0806191857t7dc65d5dkb7f24c776b925f32>