Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:09:38 -0700 From: "Krishna Mohan Gundu" <gkmohan@gmail.com> To: "Marc Fonvieille" <blackend@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wep key index in examples of section 29.3 in handbook Message-ID: <70ec82800808130309w3e4ba69cj9aefb3eeab15cfea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080811122059.GD1022@gothic.blackend.org> References: <70ec82800808110235g293bd777i647e13873d640f35@mail.gmail.com> <20080811103525.GA1022@gothic.blackend.org> <70ec82800808110505r4b2840c7tfab4ff456e890653@mail.gmail.com> <20080811122059.GD1022@gothic.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Marc, > Ok, I see. What do you think about something like: > > "Note: If you do not have any idea of what is the key used by your > access point, you should try to use 1 for both of the key and the > index." If I may correct "Note: If you do not have any idea of what key is used by your access point, you should try to use 1 for both <code>weptxkey</code> and <i>index</i>." I think using same formatting style and names introduces less ambiguity. cheers, Krishna.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70ec82800808130309w3e4ba69cj9aefb3eeab15cfea>