Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:21:49 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: how can i use ISO-8859-1?? Message-ID: <20080910062149.GA78805@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080909230840.GB54455@thought.org> References: <20080909043503.GA21663@thought.org> <20080909165456.GA56556@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080909121430.M12798@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <20080909221608.GB51272@thought.org> <20080909223941.GC65291@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080909230840.GB54455@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:08:40PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:39:41AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:16:08PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > Because it is a hiddeous waste for most readers and writers of > > > > English and other European languages. > >=20 > > > I also argured that utf-8 was a waste of a whole byte per char > > > for most of us. > >=20 > > That's not true. UTF-8 is a variable-length encoding. It is backwards > > compatible with ASCII, i.e. ascii characters are one byte in UTF-8 as > > well. Are you thinking about UTF-16? >=20 >=20 > I don't know. (Mark Twain.) Back in the late 1990's I was > assigned the project of converting all the utilities I had ported > to three European languages. Until now I had no idea there was > anything *but* utf-16, i.e. 2-bytes/char. =20 Both UTF-8 and UTF-16 are variable-width encodings.=20 =20 > With memory seriously getting to be dirt-cheap, "wasting 8-bits > doesn't seem that big a deal.=20 Indeed. > Maybe some future wizard will > invent a UTF-32 that will hold all ~90 000 Chinese characters and > these will be downsized automatically to UTF-8 when you're mixing > Mandarin with, say, Cesk [Czeck]. =20 UTF-32 already exists, but it's a fixed-width (4 bytes) encoding. > Hmm, somebody just told me that "aigu" is not English but French > and means "acute". ...all these years i thought ... oh well. > Anyway, do you know if '\0351' is a 16-bit character? is is 0xE9 > and decimal 233 and certaing should fit into a byte. just > wondering. Obviously it is a 8-bit character; anything in the range 0-255 is. In ISO 8859-1(5) it is "=E9" (e with accent aigu). Please look up UTF-8,16,32 and ISO-8859-15 on Wikipedia for further enlightenment. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjHZ30ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWlFgCcCLx749G8KqudatQcw1Fwg9Ys W74AnAtpNu5M+zEr+JfCHpVPZmBJKnZT =nbc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080910062149.GA78805>