Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:14:51 +0200 From: Rink Springer <rink@FreeBSD.org> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r183951 - user/netchild/obsolete/src/libexec/tftpd Message-ID: <20081017111451.GA67097@rink.nu> In-Reply-To: <20081017105138.GR71453@mavetju.org> References: <200810161058.m9GAw0ua059956@svn.freebsd.org> <20081017070044.GC71466@mavetju.org> <20081017112433.24936er2myfi9pwc@webmail.leidinger.net> <20081017105138.GR71453@mavetju.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:51:38PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:24:33AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> (from Fri, 17 Oct 2008
> > 18:00:44 +1100):
> >
> > >On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:58:00AM +0000, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > >> The correct spelling is EACCES, not EACCESS.
> > >[...]
> > >>- { EACCESS, "Access violation" },
> > >>+ { EACCES, "Access violation" },
> > >
> > >I am not sure what you mean with this... What is exactly wrong with
> > >the last S in EACCESS ?
> >
> > "man errno" does not list EACCESS, it only lists EACCES.
>
> True, but this is a TFTP error, not a system call return value.
> See also the Appendix "Error Codes" of RFC1350.
Wouldn't using definitions like 'TFTP_Exxx' make more sense, to prevent
possible confusion as these are TFTP-specific error values?
--
Rink P.W. Springer - http://rink.nu
"Anyway boys, this is America. Just because you get more votes doesn't
mean you win." - Fox Mulder
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081017111451.GA67097>