Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:28:36 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        scottl@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Make udf(4) MPSAFE and use shared lookups
Message-ID:  <200812021828.36857.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081122115028.GB6408@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <200811201627.58289.jhb@freebsd.org> <200811211452.02545.jhb@freebsd.org> <20081122115028.GB6408@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 22 November 2008 06:50:28 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> udf_vget() does insmntque() before vnode is fully initialized, allowing
> other threads to find the vnode on the mount list. This is typical for
> !MPSAFE fs, and it seems corresponding call was not marked XXX for udf.

It does the same as ufs.  ufs only partially initializes the i-node (as much 
as both cd9660 and udf do) and then exclusive locks the vnode before 
insmntque().  They then finish initializing the i-node (bread() the d-node, 
for example) and finally drop the vnode lock.

> udf_lookup for ISDOTDOT case unlocks dvp before vget'ing "..", allowing
> the same race on forced unmount as ufs (I will finally commit ufs patch
> today). The race happens for !MPSAFE code too, but it is easier to
> execute without Giant.

Every fs is going to need this workaround it seems.  Would be nice if there 
was an easier way to avoid cut and pasting this code N times.  Perhaps we 
could make lookup() check VI_DOOMED instead?  I had changed it do that at one 
point, but then someone pointed me at the deadfs stuff and said that was 
sufficient.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812021828.36857.jhb>