Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:56:42 +0530 From: "Mehul Chadha" <mehulc87@gmail.com> To: "Michel Talon" <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD kernel Debugging tools for Virtual Memory Module Message-ID: <251d650c0901020526w53a210f9xc1987f5eaa9c175d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090102125444.GA55765@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20090102125444.GA55765@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michel Talon Wrote: > Do you mean like vkernel in DragonFlyBSD? Yes, UML and vkernel cater to same problem the implementation being the obvious difference between them. We have implemented some part of it and working on the design of the rest. We have been following the vkernel and UML and trying to move away with some of the shortcomings in both. It will be helpful for us if we can have some valuable inputs or any advice from your side. Regards, Mehul On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> wrote: > Mehul Chadha wrote: > > > But I am working on a virtual > > mode freebsd project similar to what UML does in linux. > > Do you mean like vkernel in DragonFlyBSD? > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man/?command=vkernel§ion=ANY > > > -- > > Michel TALON > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?251d650c0901020526w53a210f9xc1987f5eaa9c175d>