Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:22:55 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issues with 2.24 upgrade Message-ID: <op.unmgw5hs9aq2h7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20090111235019.5751C1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> References: <20090111235019.5751C1CC0B@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:50:19 -0600, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote: >> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:32:29 -0600 >> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> >> >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:09:09 -0600, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> >> wrote: >> >> > I have upgraded two systems following the instructions in UPDATING and >> > have some issues. I'm not too sure of the significance, but I want ed >> > report them. >> > >> > One system is new (as of Dec. 20) with gnome2, gnome2-office, >> > gnome2-powertools and gnome2-fifth-toe installed from ports. >> > >> > First, when I ran 'pkgdb -Ff', I got: >> > Duplicated origin: x11-toolkits/gtk20 - gail-1.22.3 gtk-2.14.7 >> > Unregister any of them? [no] >> > >> > I had no idea which, if either to unregister. Similar message on >> > fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3 and gdm. I did not unregister any of >> > them and proceeded to deinstall gtkmm and run the big portupgrade. >> >> Is your ports/MOVED up to date? The pkgdb is supposed to understand >> MOVED >> (not use pkgdb/portupgrade for very long time), right? >> >> > At the end of the upgrade, I got the following messages: >> > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> > * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gail-1.22.3) >> > * x11/gdm (fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3) >> > ! x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.22.3_1) (install error) >> > >> > I ran pkgdb -Ff again and then I unregistered gail. Most (all?) gnome >> > ports had the dependency corrected. I think that this was not a >> problem, >> > but it was something I was unsure of. >> > >> > I then re-installed gnome2 and all appeared to be OK. I finally did >> > 'portupgrade gnome-session'. This was a no-op and gnome-session had >> > already been upgraded, so I did 'portupgrade -f gnome-session'. If >> this >> > was what was expected, I think UPDATING should be updated to reflect >> > this as well as the issue of the pkgdb run. >> >> I can add '-f' in UPDATING. Thanks for report! >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> > Neither system is local to me ATM, so I have not confirmed whether >> Gnome >> > 2.24 is working OK. I'll do that tomorrow. >> > >> > As always, thanks to the Gnome team for the great work! > > Yep. I have confirmed that those ports are in MOVED, but that was no > enough to deal with the merge. It works for renames and actual moves, > but merges seem beyond it's capability. I see... The portmaster has no issue with that. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.unmgw5hs9aq2h7>