Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:47:38 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: Olivier SMEDTS <olivier@gid0.org>, Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to install a port without install: in the Makefile Message-ID: <a01628140901230147y2be65b4eu66e7250f4d078c45@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090122220528.GA93433@hades.panopticon> References: <539c60b90901191200n66f37c76k749ebbb829378cb9@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980901191308l474f2d88ge7cbb860e703b737@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980901191309k2198f14ak288590cfe9e3d320@mail.gmail.com> <20090122174455.GB20525@hades.panopticon> <a01628140901221355r125624fet84c4fc41107144ca@mail.gmail.com> <20090122220528.GA93433@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Florent Thoumie (flz@xbsd.org) wrote: > >> > If it's just a single file, the preferred way is to add >> > >> > PLIST_FILES= bin/program_name >> > >> > to the Makefile and not use pkg-plist at all. >> >> No, no, no. >> >> This is not *preferred*. > > Is it not? Why? There's no reason to introduce pkg-plist for just > a single file. This is just an alternative way of doing it. I, for one, don't like it. Same goes for PLIST_DIRS. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a01628140901230147y2be65b4eu66e7250f4d078c45>