Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:02:02 -0700 From: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Omer Faruk Sen <omerfsen@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs root partition boot? Message-ID: <ade45ae90902021602y4c2a9dbfr675d7e0805f47522@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90902021504v7508e753p2caed771ac82e4be@mail.gmail.com> <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be stuck with a unbootable >> disk. I'd stick with the more mature, tested methods like gmirror or >> gvinum. Nothing beats a hardware raid though. >> > IMHO "hardware" RAID beats nothing. it's mostly crap. > > gmirror/gstripe/gconcat works well and always > Yes, each person will have their own unique view. To dismiss or put down someone else's view seems unrational There are times I prefer software raid, there are times I prefer hardware raid, neither of which will solve 100% of the problems 100% of the time. My point still stands that **IF** FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be SOL. And quote the source PROPERLY next time. The 2 letter word you DID NOT quote me on makes a difference in the point I was making. If you want to exchange flames, remove the -questions email list from the recipients.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ade45ae90902021602y4c2a9dbfr675d7e0805f47522>