Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:00:16 -0800 From: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of udbp in USB2? Message-ID: <20090209200016.GC67127@citylink.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20090209195827.GB67127@citylink.fud.org.nz> References: <7d6fde3d0902081703l71bc1de8g9bb7baf6b9b050c8@mail.gmail.com> <200902090916.54896.hselasky@c2i.net> <7d6fde3d0902091120w33c2909bma1d397114c404c1d@mail.gmail.com> <20090209195827.GB67127@citylink.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:58:28AM -0800, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:20:42AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > > > On Monday 09 February 2009, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > >> Hi Hans, > > >> I was just preparing to test out the usb2 changes and I noted that > > >> one option in my old kernel configfile didn't have an analog in the > > >> USB2 config file: udbp. > > >> I don't use the option, but I was just checking to see whether or > > >> not an analog does exist, or the support will be completely phased out > > >> when USB2 becomes the default for FreeBSD. > > >> Thanks, > > >> -Garrett > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The udbp module is now called "misc_dbp" and it still connects via netgraph. > > > Other similar devices just emulate USB ethernet devices. > > > > > > --HPS > > > > Ok... is that going to be documented in the release notes for the new > > functionality? > > All the modules should go back to their original names as part of the > removal/replacement process of oldusb->newusb. I meant to say /will/.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090209200016.GC67127>