Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:24:19 +0900 From: Hiroharu Tamaru <tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: sobomax@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/129526: pxeboot fails to load kernel / modules Message-ID: <sa6k56xd930.wl%tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <200903091001.58631.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200812091720.mB9HK1uY021743@freefall.freebsd.org> <200903021353.21920.jhb@freebsd.org> <sa6bpsd8b6m.wl%tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <200903091001.58631.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:01:58 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday 07 March 2009 1:01:05 pm Hiroharu Tamaru wrote: > > > > It sure helps the default pxeboot, so for me it is much > > better if this is commited, but what would you say? > > Ok, I will commit it. It seems more than just GPT bloated the size too much. > I'm not sure what that could be though. Thanks for the commit. It will help our setup very much. I'll be waiting for the MFC (which I noticed in the commit message) as well. By the way, I hope this won't annoy people with small embedded machines though. I mean, could it influence loader (not the PXE one but the one used for disk boot) behavior on a small system with small memory, now that the heap is at a higher place by default? Probably, it won't matter, since those people should be tuning a whole lot of things to make it work in the first place? Anyway, thanks a lot. Hiroharu Tamaru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?sa6k56xd930.wl%tamaru>