Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:41:38 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone Message-ID: <1237999298.41376.54.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20090325163654.GE32386@hades.panopticon> References: <1237901632.1849.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20090325163654.GE32386@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dmitry Marakasov p=ED=B9e v st 25. 03. 2009 v 19:36 +0300:
> * Pav Lucistnik (pav@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>=20
> Great, that was just about time.
>=20
> My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear
> that error logs may become far less readable with output from
> multiple commands mixed together.
pointyhat observes the same rules and conditions as the end user, for
obvious reasons. So ports marked 'safe' will be parallelized, others
will not.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability
is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason
to regret trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or
even explaining it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be
grateful nothing bad has happened.
-- The Register
--=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAknKXsIACgkQntdYP8FOsoJFbwCfZPMglxolCkg8/koEkeV35jne
GT4AnRtzW6Nj6ahZJxrxx027+WHTt8WP
=6pd9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-zZ3564x2AFo2zJcIz8yr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1237999298.41376.54.camel>