Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:09:41 -0700 From: "Tseng, Kuo-Lang" <kuo-lang.tseng@intel.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Declaration of intrcnt and eintrcnt in amd64/amd64/support.S Message-ID: <63FEFD5869C1DB49B69DCC57DF8F2157CA143428@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20090605202645.GF1927@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <63FEFD5869C1DB49B69DCC57DF8F2157CA08AD20@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20090605180053.I15681@delplex.bde.org> <63FEFD5869C1DB49B69DCC57DF8F2157CA0D2B62@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>, <20090605202645.GF1927@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kostik Belousov wrote on Friday, June 05, 2009 1:27 PM: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:01:50AM -0700, Tseng, Kuo-Lang wrote: >> Bruce Evans wrote on Friday, June 05, 2009 1:06 AM: >>=20 >>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Tseng, Kuo-Lang wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Currently these two variables are stored in the .text section >>>> because they are declared without a .data directive. Is there any >>>> reason why they are not declared with .data directive? Or this is >>>> missing? >>>=20 >>> This is just a bug, as is formatting mail for 220-column terminals. >>> It is missing in the reference i386 version which has a .data >>> directive before some other variables that don't exist on amd64. >>> Apparently, these variables only work because the text section is >>> not write protected. Write protection of the text section was lost >>> long ago on i386.=20 >>>=20 >>> intrnames and eintrnames are also in the text section. >>>=20 >>> Bruce >>=20 >> Can we fix it soon? >=20 > See r193535. Is this a bug id? Can someone please forward me the link to the database?=20 Thanks Kuo=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63FEFD5869C1DB49B69DCC57DF8F2157CA143428>