Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:40:01 -0700 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: C syntax question Message-ID: <20090630024001.GC72216@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20090630022004.GB72216@comcast.net> References: <19017.24376.343126.389436@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20090629204828.02ee3cb8@mail.pchotshots.com> <20090630021210.GA72216@comcast.net> <20090630022004.GB72216@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 29 Jun 2009 at 19:20:04 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: >On Mon 29 Jun 2009 at 19:12:10 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: >> >>Of course, it doesn't hurt to specify the number of elements in >>both dimensions. But it would be a less general solution, With >>only the minor dimension specified, plate_shift can take pointers >>to arrays of 20, 30, 40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures. Any > >Oops. That's not worded correctly. It should be: > >... plate_shift can take a pointer to a multidimensional array of >20,30,40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures. > >(Don't you hate it when your mistakes come back to haunt you in your >inbox?) I should have quit while I was ahead. If this was a programming interview, I just flunked it. :(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630024001.GC72216>