Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:01:51 -0400 From: "Joe Kraft" <jvk-ctm@thekrafts.org> To: <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Do you still want CTM? Message-ID: <008a01ca14eb$6214a270$263de750$@org> In-Reply-To: <20090804055311.GA20414@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu> <20090804031753.GP98247@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> <20090804055311.GA20414@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 04-Aug-2009 at 13:17:53 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2009-Aug-03 21:46:06 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> wrote: > > >My question is this - are there people who still depend on CTM for their > > >updates? Or is it time to close down CTM? Or is there someone else who > > >wants to take it over? > > > > I don't have CVSup access at work and currently rely on CTM delta > > emails. I also use CTM (via FTP) at home because that was easy to > > setup and means my trees at home and work are synchronised. > > Same here ;-) Me too. No access through the firewall at work to run CVSup or FTP so e-mail is the way to go. > > > > > I could switch to CVSup at home without too much hassle but loss of > > CTM would be a serious hassle at work - the easiest solution would > > Exactly the same here. Additionally, I use a script which > applies the deltas and filters out changes and local > modifications. I am doing it this way since FreeBSD-2.1.5 ;-). > > If CTM went away the world would not end but I would miss > it heavily for sure. > Occasionally I drop an e-mail and have to transfer something manually from home and it's a PITA for sure. > Thanks a lot for all your efforts being put into CTM! > > -Andre My thanks also. Joe.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?008a01ca14eb$6214a270$263de750$>