Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:05:25 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: jasonh@DataIX.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> Subject: Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions Message-ID: <4A886685.1060801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090815161342.28932adc.jasonh@DataIX.net> References: <B787D58E-9157-48E7-ADF3-E8D54F8AF22F@exscape.org> <4A86FF1E.1030705@quip.cz> <6B5B7698-CCD8-48FF-A5FB-0349D4CC1143@exscape.org> <20090815154851.be2ac5a7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <4A871560.70202@FreeBSD.org> <20090815161342.28932adc.jasonh@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700
> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
>>
>>> Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local and youll be informed of packages that need updating.
>> Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to
>> remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette:
>
> No its not a problem at all I must have missed part of the thread and picked up the portion where pkg_version was being discussed.
No worries. Like I said I picked your post more or less at random. We
all need a reminder now and then, including me! :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A886685.1060801>