Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:51:33 +0000 From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>, Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics Message-ID: <0B6596C6C29340D738A8A729@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090902120508.2558236d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20090820023314.GF1295@hades.panopticon> <4A8CCC24.8050605@p6m7g8.com> <6B974976DD234EF08949F6A8@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090820164036.GA12998@hades.panopticon> <1250790054.45433.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090821181232.GB59823@hades.panopticon> <1250882387.50625.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090902031433.GA1304@hades.panopticon> <4A9E2505.1070306@FreeBSD.org> <20090902120508.2558236d@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 04:05:08 -0500 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > In my case, over a few retries, switch is the fastest, followed by > surfnet. heatnet is only somewhere between 500-700K. > dfn, garr: and ovh fail. It might be way too much work for very little benefit, but network latencies being what they are, perhaps there should be a routine that runs periodically and adjusts the list according to some connectivity parameters? (Yeah, I know, easy for me to say. I don't have to write the code.) -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0B6596C6C29340D738A8A729>