Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:52:52 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Andrew Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au>, peterjeremy@acm.org, FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Reducing noise in dmesg output Message-ID: <20090904135252.GA23438@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20090904101630.GA17207@camelot.theinternet.com.au> References: <200909010931.16880.nick@van-laarhoven.org> <1251841416.1689.4458.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <200909021656.15747.nick@van-laarhoven.org> <f0dd9eb90909021739o4d31c88l5be6638f7998dae6@mail.gmail.com> <20090904100847.GA13167@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20090904101630.GA17207@camelot.theinternet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No one has mentioned the other reason to leave in verbosity: so that users who are having problems can file more useful PRs. This is particularly true of video cards (which, as one might recall, is where this thread started.) In some cases it can save a whole round-trip of "please reboot with another flag set and provide the following information ..." mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090904135252.GA23438>