Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:17:24 -0300 From: Agus <agus.262@gmail.com> To: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reverse Proxy /Proxy Pass Message-ID: <fda61bb50909081417h24642fe4ne5a6609d90c90ebc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200909051903.29244.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <fda61bb50909031620n60b14d4bq88e8f1789a290116@mail.gmail.com> <200909040212.44397.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <fda61bb50909050055m3a70be2by17f4e38ce9c1f0b5@mail.gmail.com> <200909051903.29244.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/9/5 Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>: > On Saturday 05 September 2009 09:55:54 Agus wrote: >> 2009/9/3 Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>: >> > On Friday 04 September 2009 01:20:46 Agus wrote: >> >> What server, application do u know/recommend me for using as a >> >> ProxyPass / Reverse Proxy... >> >> >> >> The idea is to forward all requests to port 80 to this server and then >> >> from here according to the vhost send it to the actual server... For >> >> now i only need proxying.. dont think cacheing will be possible so im >> >> just looking for a pretty fast, light and stable app to do this on a >> >> freebsd 7... >> >> >> >> Thanks and ihope to hear some cool recommendations.. hehe >> > >> > If lightweight, go with www/nginx. Features, go with www/squid or >> > apache+mod_proxy. >> > -- >> > Mel >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> Thanks Mel... Now i've been reading a little and found that cherokee >> maybe a very good alternative also.... I also found that the >> performance will variate according to the syscall the server uses... i >> read about poll,etc.... how to know which syscalls does the servers >> support and which one is better/fastest? > > kqueue is preferred on *BSD, since it's able to aggregate multiple filter > matches into one event if they happen to occur in a close time frame. This > reduces copyout from kernel to userland. It also used to be true that poll is > a busywait, but I think that has been corrected. > > If you're interested, the original design document for kqueue is available > here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jlemon/papers/kqueue.pdf > -- > Mel > Greatt.. sorry for the late response.. i was on vacations in a place with no internet... hehe... on the second day i was cryinggg.. haha thanks so much for the explanation and link... will read that and try to understand a bit ... hehe Cheers, AR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fda61bb50909081417h24642fe4ne5a6609d90c90ebc>