Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:56:25 +0100 From: Adrian Glaubitz <adrian.glaubitz@googlemail.com> To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Cc: sfourman@gmail.com, ports@freebsd.org, kmoore@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: qtcreator-1.2.1: Not installable Message-ID: <1e6df7760910280556q3d9f0394t87b192fbbbf9adad@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091028134640.58eb3cb9@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <4AE79A4E.3070404@googlemail.com> <11167f520910271955q45c4109dqd2ada4959ce58db8@mail.gmail.com> <1e6df7760910280245y7717d74cn4cefc6a581c6260f@mail.gmail.com> <20091028134640.58eb3cb9@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> wrote: > The qtcreator port was created on May 7, 2009. =A0Seems to me that 7.2R > is older than that. =A0Obviously, qtcreator can't exist for 7.2R if the > port didn't exist when it was released. Well, ok. Seems another case of "different systems, different philosophies" here for me. My idea was that I was downloading the latest STABLE release of FreeBSD and I assumed that the ports directory always applies to the current STABLE version, noone should use a development version for daily use, should one. Besides, the ports website doesn't list at all what versions of FreeBSD include this port as opposed to Debian, for example; I don't want to start a flamewar though. It's not really user-friendly, is it. I guess the minimum for my project will be FreeBSD 8.0 then. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1e6df7760910280556q3d9f0394t87b192fbbbf9adad>