Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:26:46 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Subject: Re: mmap(2) with MAP_ANON honouring offset although it shouldn't Message-ID: <20091104162646.GZ1293@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <200911040812.18712.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <permail-200910211551041e86ffa80000182a-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> <ca3526250910211051v2fef55e7yda262a58df200751@mail.gmail.com> <20091103172452.GU1293@hoeg.nl> <200911040812.18712.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hgy5D1otryeNPdmY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Note that the spec doesn't cover MAP_ANON at all FWIW. Yes. I've noticed Linux also uses MAP_ANONYMOUS instead of MAP_ANON. They do provide MAP_ANON for compatibility, if I remember correctly. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --hgy5D1otryeNPdmY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrxq0YACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWxPwCdFnFuM4q0CK4TqxukEbDQypj9 wxUAnjbJTX53au+a9mGWQVzcysP/eJ/8 =jpk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hgy5D1otryeNPdmY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091104162646.GZ1293>