Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:03:02 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: g95 as a system fortran compiler? Message-ID: <4B2F8016.10501@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091221134742.GA51919@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <d873d5be0912201647t25796ffdidb17524368e46900@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.99.0912211136400.7608@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <86y6kwpit1.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20091221134742.GA51919@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: <snip lots> > > Apparently there's even ItaniumŪ Solutions Alliance: > > http://www.itaniumsolutions.org/alliance > > Sounds like a good place to approach with fbsd on ia64 > projects.. > > The fact that redhat are droppping ia64 support in future releases( see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/18/redhat_rhel6_itanium_dead/ among others,) may make a difference too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2F8016.10501>