Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:25:01 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: still trouble with pci.c on i386 Message-ID: <86zl53105u.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200912281058.40733.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:58:40 -0500") References: <d873d5be0912201722v6269800bx989510d47ace1888@mail.gmail.com> <20091222174248.GA61700@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200912281058.40733.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > This discussion is pointless if your source tree is not a Subversion > > working copy. > That's not true. I still use cvsweb quite often as one can more easily s= ee=20 > what has been MFC'd that way rather than with the svn equivalent. And it= is=20 > easy to use cvsweb to find a particular CVS revision and map it to an SVN= =20 > revision. The discussion was about using Subversion to woll back commits in what was in all probability either a cvsup checkout or a CVS working copy. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zl53105u.fsf>