Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:19:23 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SANE vs USB scanner on 8.0 Message-ID: <20100125121923.9bdf5ab8.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20100125045720.GA5475@duncan.reilly.home> References: <200909282240.53802.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200910291205.05757.hselasky@c2i.net> <200910292313.24636.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200910291347.10390.hselasky@c2i.net> <20100110184252.a2efd4cd.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20100124031045.ad6515c9.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001231952522.16761@wonkity.com> <20100124143139.99b7d102.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001240918070.19728@wonkity.com> <20100125035721.GA18157@duncan.reilly.home> <20100125045720.GA5475@duncan.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:57:20 +1100 Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > OK, I've "fixed" my copy of the snapscan backend, to behave > nicely with FreeBSD's new libusb. Here's my patch, to be > applied in /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends/work/sane-backends-1.0.20/backend: This patch fixes my problem too. Thanks! -- Torfinn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100125121923.9bdf5ab8.torfinn.ingolfsen>