Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:07:28 -0500 From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendation Message-ID: <4B6BA790.2070500@telenix.org> In-Reply-To: <20100204120512.GU61667@e.0x20.net> References: <4B67A778.7040001@telenix.org> <87vdefgtbx.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20100202231840.GB1920@comcast.net> <87k4uvgp5o.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20100203064734.GC1920@comcast.net> <4B69CE8A.1050300@telenix.org> <20100204120512.GU61667@e.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Engels wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > >> I've had some great suggestions so far. I think I'll go try amarok first, and >> maybe rhythmbox next. You folks are REALLY helpful, thanks!! > > If you don't mind using java, you can also take a look at atunes. Hadn't before, but I will now, thanks. I was kinda less than overjoyed that audacious forced me to abandon artsd (maybe I did something wrong?) but moving to esound fixed it. I tried to move to jack, but the freebsd-specific help stinks on that ... I *think* it's trying to force me to use the Linux audio driver, which I *won't* do. I have jdk 1.6 working amazingly well, so next stop is a look at atunes, for my curiosity ... because I have to admit, audacious fits my requirements. Amarok just wouldn't build, a C++ compile error. I *do* know c++, but I'm just no expert in it, so troubleshooting C++ isn'[t my first choice (hell, I truly dislike C++ for the specific reason that it's hard to troubleshoot, even for experts.) They've tossed in so many "features" ....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B6BA790.2070500>