Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:53:54 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        bzeeb+freebsd+lor@zabbadoz.net, Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LOR: vfs_mount.c (ufs) / msdosfs_vfsops.c (devfs)
Message-ID:  <20100208145354.GJ9991@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <201002080900.44745.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <20100207160031.GA27434@muon.cran.org.uk> <201002080900.44745.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NgG1H2o5aFKkgPy/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:00:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2010 11:00:32 am Bruce Cran wrote:
> > Running -CURRENT from today, I unmounted the msdosfs filesystem on my=
=20
> > phone and got the following LOR:
> >=20
> > lock order reversal:
> >  1st 0xffffff00c51279f8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1204
> >  2nd 0xffffff010b892278 devfs (devfs) @=20
> > /usr/src/sys/modules/msdosfs/../../fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_vfsops.c:944
> > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a
> > _witness_debugger() at witness_debugger+0x2e
> > witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0x81e
> > __lockmgr_args() at __lockmgr_args+0xd11
> > vop_stdlock() at vop_stdlock+0x39
> > VOP_LOCK1_APV() VOP_LOCK1_APV+0x9b
> > _vn_lock() at _vn_lock+0x47
> > msdosfs_sync() at msdosfs_sync+0x227
> > dounmount() at dounmount+0x2ca
> > unmount() at unmount+0x216
> > syscall() at syscall+0x2a2
> > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xe1
> > --- syscall (22, FreeBSD ELF64, unmount), rip =3D 0x8006a1e3c, rsp =3D=
=20
> > 0x7fffffffe3a8, rbp =3D 0x800c08010 ---
>=20
> This is due to holding a lock on the coveredvp vnode for most of unmount(=
2).
> Probably it should not be held for all of that.  Perhaps it is safe to ju=
st=20
> keep the vnode referenced instead, or could the handling for coveredvp ju=
st
> move to the end of the function where it is now vput?

Among other things, holding vnode lock on covered vnode prevents parallel
unmounts of the same mount point.

--NgG1H2o5aFKkgPy/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAktwJYIACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jTVgCg7KRmdWz9V8kQCe+ybnP7LwiL
Fj0AoKffKJuAzWOWllcbKzAJNabzuCKz
=v3AH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NgG1H2o5aFKkgPy/--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100208145354.GJ9991>