Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:38:47 +0100
From:      Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>
Cc:        Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LinuxBSDos.com article
Message-ID:  <20100218183847.GK27126@e.0x20.net>
In-Reply-To: <201002181824.LAA04818@lariat.net>
References:  <20100218100632.GA60258@comcast.net> <201002181824.LAA04818@lariat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:24:44AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 03:06 AM 2/18/2010, Charlie Kester wrote:
> 
> >http://linuxbsdos.com/2010/02/18/pc-bsds-graphical-firewall-manager/
> >
> >"PC-BSD is ... the only BSD-based distribution that’s in a position to
> >compete with the best Linux desktop distributions..."
> 
> Wish it were fully BSD-based! Alas, it uses a GPLed GUI. (Yes, I 
> know that this doesn't matter to everyone, but it matters a lot to 
> me personally. I want to be able to hack on the code without 
> lending support to the political agenda that accompanies the GPL; I 
> also do not want to open myself to appropriation of my work due to 
> having inspected GPLed code. No flame wars, please.)
> 
> In any event, if I were to run a FreeBSD-based desktop system (as 
> opposed to servers and appliances, which is what I do with 
> FreeBSD), I'd want the GUI to be BSD-licensed or Apache-licensed.

Fluxbox is also in PCBSD's base system. It is released under a BSD
license.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt9iTYACgkQKc512sD3afiaKgCfTZS9gqH3qZu1k7uQ9JzJZJK6
vhQAoJvLQP9BLVsd0o7lkUH7qOgXIveF
=BKot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100218183847.GK27126>