Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:13:34 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Small problem with "ipfw list" Message-ID: <20100315211334.GB95605@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <201003151857.o2FIvOCW081355@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20100315183132.GA94552@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <201003151857.o2FIvOCW081355@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:57:24PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just a question: Is the output from "ipfw list" supposed
> > > to be in the same rule format that is accepted as input?
> > > If that's the case, then there is a small bug:
> > >
> > > # ipfw add 100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or 2.2.2.2 '}'
> > > 00100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or dst-ip 2.2.2.2 '}'
> >
> > ok this should be fixed now in head (revision 205179)
>
> Great, thank you very much for doing this!
>
> Do you think this could be merged to stable/8 and stable/7?
it's a trivial change to the userland program so whoever wants
to do the merge is welcome. I should be able to merge to stable/8
perhaps next monday, whereas for stable/7 perhaps we should wait for the
code freeze to end ?
cheers
luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100315211334.GB95605>