Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:36:43 -0700 From: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: Tsuyoshi Ozawa <ozawa+bsd@t-oza.net>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Subject: Re: Dynamic ticks in FreeBSD Message-ID: <o2wed91d4a81003310736rc7f77745y67fd7a1fc5898209@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100331142258.GA33359@freebsd.org> References: <411a180c1003300537g2a1b4879u2d8d952ce9977cb5@mail.gmail.com> <411a180c1003300639l13d33451q305a61b2bcd6e3d5@mail.gmail.com> <20100330173504.GA70578@freebsd.org> <p2p411a180c1003310505qb6e274f2i7b39aa3dd7387d24@mail.gmail.com> <20100331142258.GA33359@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It may be worth it to look at Solaris' cyclic facillity for ideas. sys/cddl/dev/cyclic/cyclic.c --Artem On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:05:33AM -0800, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: >> Thank you for replying ! >> >> The patch for FreeBSD 8.0 original source is here : >> http://gist.github.com/350230 > > looks good > > I wonder - why don't we store the callouts in binary > tree so the searching for nearest callout is faster? > > what is the average length of the callout queue? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?o2wed91d4a81003310736rc7f77745y67fd7a1fc5898209>