Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 May 2010 12:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Better handling of stale filehandles in open() in the NFS client
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.63.1005241143160.29428@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
In-Reply-To: <201005211039.04108.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <201005191144.00382.jhb@freebsd.org> <201005200922.17245.jhb@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1005202036570.15248@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <201005211039.04108.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Baldwin wrote:


> No, it's not the lock, it's this thing Mohan added here in nfs_open():
>
> 		struct thread *td = curthread;
>
> 		if (np->n_ac_ts_syscalls != td->td_syscalls ||
> 		    np->n_ac_ts_tid != td->td_tid ||
> 		    td->td_proc == NULL ||
> 		    np->n_ac_ts_pid != td->td_proc->p_pid) {
> 			np->n_attrstamp = 0;
> 			KDTRACE_NFS_ATTRCACHE_FLUSH_DONE(vp);
> 		}
>
> Which used to be an unconditional clearing of n_attrstamp so that the
> VOP_GETATTR() in nfs_open() would always go over the wire.  Now it doesn't
> clear the attributes if the attribute cache was last updated during the same
> system call that is invoking nfs_open() by the same thread.
>
> Hmm, however, concurrent lookups of the same pathname may cause this test to
> fail and still clear n_attrstamp since we now use shared vnode locks for
> pathname lookups.  That was true before my change as well.  In fact, using
> shared vnode locks for read-only opens (the MNTK_EXTENDED_SHARED flag)
> probably does cause Mohan's patch to not work in many cases which probably
> accounts for the small increase in RPC counts.
>
> Try setting the vfs.lookup_shared sysctl to 0 to see if that removes all the
> extra RPCs.  Another change would be to readd the change to flush the
> attribute cache on close and see if that also brings back extra
> attribute/access RPCs without my patch (but with lookup_shared left enabled)
> to verify that shared lookups are the root cause of extra RPCs.
>
Ok, I've played with this a bit and here's what I've seen:
- Disabling vfs.lookup_shared had no effect. Since I'm running a single
   thread (no "-j" on the make) ad nothing else on the machine during the
   tests, that seems to make sense.

- When I added some printfs, here's what seems to be happening.
   snippet of nfs_lookup():
 		if ((cnp->cn_flags & (ISLASTCN | ISOPEN)) ==
 		    (ISLASTCN | ISOPEN)) {
 			newnp = VTONFS(newvp);
 			mtx_lock(&newnp->n_mtx);
 			newnp->n_attrstamp = 0;
 			mtx_unlock(&newnp->n_mtx);
 		}
 		if (!VOP_GETATTR(newvp, &vattr, cnp->cn_cred)
 		    && vattr.va_ctime.tv_sec == newnp->n_ctime) {
 			nfsstats.lookupcache_hits++;
 			if (cnp->cn_nameiop != LOOKUP &&
 			    (flags & ISLASTCN))
 				cnp->cn_flags |= SAVENAME;
 			return (0);
 		}
--> gets here about 9,000 times
     --> As far as I can see, these getattrs are part of the price
         you pay for your patch. (Cache misses that aren't caused by
         VOP_GETATTR() failing.)

snippet of nfs_open():
 	if (np->n_flag & NMODIFIED) {
 		...
--> gets here about 6,000 times. The extra Getattrs for this case can
         be avoied by adding if ((newnp->n_flag & NMODIFIED) == 0)
 	for setting newnp->n_attrstamp = 0; above.
 	} else {
 		struct thread *td = curthread;

 		if (np->n_ac_ts_syscalls != td->td_syscalls ||
 		    np->n_ac_ts_tid != td->td_tid ||
 		    td->td_proc == NULL ||
 		    np->n_ac_ts_pid != td->td_proc->p_pid) {
 			np->n_attrstamp = 0;
 			KDTRACE_NFS_ATTRCACHE_FLUSH_DONE(vp);
--> never gets here, which makes sense since your patch forces the Getattr
     to be done in nfs_lookup(). I wouldn't say that this can "never"
     happen with the patch applied, because of concurrency with shared
     vnode locks, but it isn't happening for this test.
 		}
 		mtx_unlock(&np->n_mtx);
 		error = VOP_GETATTR(vp, &vattr, ap->a_cred);

So, I can see where about 15,000 of the extra Getattrs occur, but haven't
nailed down the other 20,000. I do see a lot of cases where the namei()
call in vn_open_cred() at line#189 of vfs_vnops.c returns an error. I
haven't figured out if those account for the other 20,000. (ie. are there
cases where namei()/nfs_lookup() fails after having forced the Getattr)
Since namei() fails, VOP_OPEN() doesn't get called.

In summary, I haven't nailed down where 20,000 of the extra Getattr RPCs
happen, but if it still achieves what you want, adding the
 	if ((newnp->n_flag & NMODIFIED) == 0)
before 		newnp->n_attrstamp = 0;
gets rid of some of them.

I'm going to run some tests with Readdirplus enabled, to see what effect
the patch has for that case, rick.


























Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.1005241143160.29428>