Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:30 +0200
From:      Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To:        Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com>, brucec@FreeBSD.org, jilles@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bin/146916: [patch] sh(1) uses dumb terminal in single-user mode
Message-ID:  <20100528103830.GK56080@hoeg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20100528103618.GJ56080@hoeg.nl>
References:  <201005281033.o4SAXjlv078228@freefall.freebsd.org> <20100528103618.GJ56080@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
* Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:
> Why should the shell be responsible for this? Shouldn't we put stuff
> like this in /sbin/init?

Oh wait. Never mind. I understand the issue. Jilles, what do you think
about this?

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkv/nSYACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUcOQCfeCiB9qtW5D3EE7WjOQNVSgAy
ZbgAnAvIAhqPDyK9NLAij7kmVNoDDGfQ
=uIZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100528103830.GK56080>