Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:33:04 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case) Message-ID: <4C0DF230.4010603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100608092305.135975l67lzv7ksg@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <4C04CAAA.7080001@janh.de> <20100603123728.GA1605@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100603150208.19603v4b90d4jeec@webmail.leidinger.net> <4C09010A.7010906@janh.de> <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown> <4C0D03A1.3040100@FreeBSD.org> <20100608092305.135975l67lzv7ksg@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: >> How hard is it? What prevents us in doing it? Later we modify libtool >> upstream, later we could switch to record only direct dependencies. > > You should talk with the libtool maintainer about libtool. Ah, you were all waiting for me to talk to libtool maintainer, you could tell me before :-) > Regarding the pkg-config stuff: you just have to determine which libs > are direct and which are indirect deps for a specific port, move the > indirect one into Libs.private, and then convince the upstream > maintainers to pick up this change. These are all "simple" steps. You haven't answered to "What prevents us in doing it?" If we haven't already done it, I bet there is a reason. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0DF230.4010603>