Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:42:43 -0400 From: bdsfbsd@att.net To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk vs diablo-jdk Message-ID: <op.vepe1hsahtl4zj@ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100622122650.GA6217@duncan.reilly.home> References: <L4BITB$256B16536B50416832DBC1B09283CA26@libero.it> <op.venm5oo1htl4zj@ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu> <4C1F85D5.7040408@intertainservices.com> <op.ven4kgw8htl4zj@ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu> <20100622122650.GA6217@duncan.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:26:50 -0400, Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:58:55PM -0400, bdsfbsd@att.net wrote: >> I don't get it, how can openjdk bring in diablo-jdk as a dependency yet >> be >> less functional? > > It's just a build dependency. You need to have java in order to > compile a java that's all written in java... > > Cheers, > Ahhhh... newbie vocab word of the day.. "build dependency" It is all so much clearer now, thank you! Brian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.vepe1hsahtl4zj>