Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:38:02 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, paul <paul_@freemail.hu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs YouTube Message-ID: <20100716183802.GA1816@holstein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20100714192246.b4daa560.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <freemail.20100714182602.26042.1@xmldata14.freemail.hu> <20100714190142.da43214e.freebsd@edvax.de> <AANLkTilLgKYIIgpvR-CfyfMRP1x-faUzt7e_E4dwA-hP@mail.gmail.com> <20100714192246.b4daa560.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <20100714192246.b4daa560.freebsd@edvax.de>, wrote Polytropon thusly... > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:06:14 +0300, Odhiambo Washington > <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is this the same way the Linux users have it?:-) > > I don't think so. The Linux "Flash" plugin seems to work better on > Linux than it does on FreeBSD. ... > "Flash" stuff on Linux is to have this plugin installed for > Firefox. As I'm not a regular Linux user, I can't be sure, but at > least that's my opinion. :-) On CentOS 5.x, I have yet to experience a problem with videos on YouTube, Vimeo, & some others while playing them in Firefox via Flash plugin. On FreeBSD, when possible, I download the file to play with xine. - parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100716183802.GA1816>