Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:33:04 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julien Laffaye <jlaffaye@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 181582 for review
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimOB1u9eF9JrFyARY6R2owgDUKwESeHqrC-b6yK@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201007292123.o6TLN3Td039516@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <201007292123.o6TLN3Td039516@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Julien Laffaye <jlaffaye@freebsd.org> wrote:
> http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@181582?ac=10
>
> Change 181582 by jlaffaye@jlaffaye-chulak on 2010/07/29 21:23:01
>
>        - Rework the fetch_archive() function to return a file descriptor of the
>        downloaded archive.
>        Reading on-the-fly doesn't work if we fetch dependencies: the remote
>        server close the connection because we are inactive (in fact we are
>        busy downloading the dependency). Reading on-the-fly could work if we
>        knew the dependencies, in the proper order, of the package before
>        downloading it (thus, download and install the dependencies first).
>        - While I'm here, print the progress (percentage) of the dowload.
>

...

> +       if (archive_read_open_fd(a, fd, 10240) != ARCHIVE_OK) {
> +           warnx("archive_read_open_fd(): %s", archive_error_string(a));
> +           retcode = 1;
> +           goto cleanup;

Overall change looks good, but why 10240 :)?
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimOB1u9eF9JrFyARY6R2owgDUKwESeHqrC-b6yK>