Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:02:39 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tiny sys/sys/signal.h cleanup Message-ID: <20100810100239.GA74125@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100810091806.GC2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100810015347.GA17233@freebsd.org> <20100810091806.GC2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue Aug 10 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:53:47AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > just wanted to get some feedback for this tiny patch and if people think it > > makes sense. > > I almost agree with the part of the patch that removes excessive commenting > for the individual signals. But I do not see much sense in repeating the > text that would be better suited for the man page, like signal(3). actually a lot of the comment is taken from signal(3). ;) i don't think however signals should be explained merely in one manual. sigaction(2) e.g. also documents the signals. so i thought having a brief explanation of the signals in signal.h would be helpful. plus as you said it gets rid of some of the individual signal-comments. cheers. alex -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100810100239.GA74125>