Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:05:29 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw fwd and ipfw allow Message-ID: <4c8b3849.mx6rDwHZtDT6N5YR%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <20100910125534.GA50527@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20100822052550.GA42346@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20100907090012.GA48608@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4C8616F0.5010401@gmx.com> <20100907110033.GA51618@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4C864145.80805@gmx.com> <20100907145223.GA55660@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4C8754CD.6030003@gmx.com> <20100910125534.GA50527@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Victor Sudakov <sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru> wrote: > ... the 'fwd ... keep-state' statement does create a useful > dynamic rule. It contradicts the ipfw(8) man page but works ... Hopefully someone who understands all this will submit a patch for the man page :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c8b3849.mx6rDwHZtDT6N5YR%perryh>