Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:29:50 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com>, melifaro@ipfw.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323 Message-ID: <4C98DD7E.9000203@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <201009211705.22723.david@vizion2000.net> References: <201009201028.38559.david@vizion2000.net> <201009211034.07859.david@vizion2000.net> <4C98D589.4030107@aldan.algebra.com> <201009211705.22723.david@vizion2000.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
21.09.2010 12:05, David Southwell ΞΑΠΙΣΑΧ(ΜΑ): > Problem is opal does not compile due to failure which was in original > posting: According to: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/opal-2.2.11_2.log.bz2 Opal builds just fine -- in the "clean" environment... As does ptlib: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/ptlib-2.4.4.log.bz2 Which means, there is something about your configuration, that interferes with the build. I'm not blaming you -- ports (unlike packages) ought to be flexible and build properly in a variety of configurations. The price for that flexibility, however, is having to deal with an occasional breakage, when your setup deviates "too far" from the mainstream. But you need to, at least, diagnose the problem yourself. Does the presence of some "unusual" package break the build? Any other unexpected setting/configuration option? Include that info in a PR, so that the problem can be reproduced... Thanks! Yours, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C98DD7E.9000203>