Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:54:26 -0400 From: Joe Auty <joe@netmusician.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib/compat and /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg Message-ID: <4CC0B692.2070002@netmusician.org> In-Reply-To: <20101021174358.GE5644@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4CC079D4.5070309@netmusician.org> <20101021174358.GE5644@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Oct 21), Joe Auty said: >> The other night I spent some frustrating time discovering that after >> updating from 7.2 to 8.1, for some reason some of the libraries in >> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg were 32 bit on my 64 bit system which was >> causing several of my binaries to generate "unsupported filesystem >> layout" errors. I ended up copying the ones from /usr/local/lib/compat >> into /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg which seemed to fix the problem. > > Did you also do a 32-> 64-bit migration at some point? You probably should > have moved everything in /usr/local/lib/compat to /usr/local/lib32 then to > avoid problems. 32-bit apps shouldn't look for their shlibs in > /usr/local/lib on a 64-bit system. You can manually move any remaining ones > by using the "file" command to identify 32-bit files, then moving them (or > removing them if you have no 32-bit apps anymore). > Nope, there was never a 32 -> 64 bit migration or vice versa. However, doing a: file /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libcrypt.so.4 indicated that several of these libraries in compat/pkg were i386 rather than amd64. -- Joe Auty, NetMusician NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks. www.netmusician.org <http://www.netmusician.org> joe@netmusician.org <mailto:joe@netmusician.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CC0B692.2070002>