Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:14:47 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> Cc: uqs@spoerlein.net, hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels? Message-ID: <4CDD2FB7.3000401@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <20101110204152.GF85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011111315430.30414@fledge.watson.org> <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 12/11/2010 01:08 Stanislav Sedov said the following: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@spoerlein.net> mentioned: >> >>> Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a ping. >>> I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to use that >>> library or not, but crashdump support is a key goal of it. >> >> Thanks for the hint, stas CC'ed and reply-to set. >> > > Yes, the idea was to refactor all base tools > to use libprocstat as well. So far only > procstat(8), fuser and fstat have been converted to use new functionality, so they are able to operate both on coredumps and on the live system. > We still need to commit the libprocstat itself, > though. > Just to let you know that I am eagerly awaiting for that to happen. Perhaps even could help with something if you'd need that. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDD2FB7.3000401>