Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:27:42 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing. Message-ID: <AANLkTi=h1XaKDrv0VEKUqxvQsJTzCp-kaz9q9_wia5QS@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110116173705.4653d137@dijkstra> References: <20110114181925.49e5ee2d@dijkstra> <4D3163BE.9020607@FreeBSD.org> <20110116173705.4653d137@dijkstra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Christopher J. Ruwe <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote: > 2) I noticed Martin Matuska's site patches more recent than Dec 18th, > but marked nopython. What do these mean and can/should I try these > also? I remember reading somewhere about this, but I cannot find > anymore. > The nopython patches include the code from Illumos which removes the dependancy on Python and the sysutils/py-zfs Port which were used to provide the allow, unallow, userspace, and groupspace zfs commands. The nopython patches will most likely be the code that gets merged into -CURRENT and eventually -STABLE. Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=h1XaKDrv0VEKUqxvQsJTzCp-kaz9q9_wia5QS>