Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:19:51 -0400 From: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rfc] 64-bit inode numbers Message-ID: <4E027897.8080700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110120124108.GA32866@tops.skynet.lt> References: <20101201091203.GA3933@tops> <20110104175558.GR3140@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110120124108.GA32866@tops.skynet.lt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/20/11 7:41 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > I've updated the patch. New version is available here: > https://github.com/downloads/glk/freebsd-ino64/freebsd-ino64-patch-2011-01-20.tgz > > Changelog: > * Add fts, ftw, nftw compat shims in libc > * Place libc compat shims in separate files, don't hack original > implementations. > * Fix dump/restore > * Use ino_t in UFS code (suggested by Kirk McKusick) > * Keep ufs_ino_t (32 bit) for boot2 not to increase size > Sorry for replying to an older message, but a reply made in a different thread reminded me about this project... Also, I may have asked this before. In fact, I'm almost sure that I started a reply to this back in Jan/Feb, but my email client claims I never replied to this topic... Are you increasing only the size of ino_t, or could you also look at increasing the size of dev_t? (just curious...) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E027897.8080700>