Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 17:41:47 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opinions sought on location of bsd.octave.mk Message-ID: <20110703214147.GA4773@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20110703205302.GA22963@lonesome.com> References: <4E10BB64.9010904@missouri.edu> <20110703193906.GA4329@magic.hamla.org> <20110703205302.GA22963@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 15:53:02 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > fwiw, these ideas were most alepulver's. Speaking just for myself, I > didn't agree with most of them. > > Personally I'd rather see them all in Mk/; my view is that it saves a lot > of hunting around. Sure, Mk/ or Mk/plugins; traversing one step deeper into a directory tree is trivial from a "hunting" perspective. The main point (and takeaway from that document) for me is that the aggregation of the various Mk scripts in one location is more desirable than scattering them throughout the tree. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110703214147.GA4773>