Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:25:24 +0800 From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: porter handbook MASTER_SITES section outdated? Message-ID: <20110801062524.GI15520@bonjour.sunpoet.net> In-Reply-To: <20110731213748.GA3533@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110731213748.GA3533@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:37:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > In sec 5.4.2 MASTER_SITES in the porter handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#AEN1512 > > the example given is: > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} > > However, sunpoet@ has just committed my patch > changing my ${IGNORE_MASTER_SITE_XCONTRIB} and > ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} to: > > MASTER_SITES= XCONTRIB/applications \ > http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/ \ > LOCAL/simon > > Are both forms acceptable? Or is the form > given in the porters handbook outdated? Hi Anton, I'm using the condensed format (the second grey box in that section). It's more clear as the complex MASTER_SITES/MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR modifiers (${foo:S///} and :foo) can be eliminated in your case. Thanks. Regards, sunpoet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110801062524.GI15520>