Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:24:40 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadvise(2) system call Message-ID: <CAGH67wTx_71D3L-Nj-c7JM=zTmfq7vZ-_vTBRLArkHfV73RjsA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111031212157.GQ2258@hoeg.nl> References: <201110281426.00013.jhb@freebsd.org> <201110311024.07580.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031190359.GP2258@hoeg.nl> <201110311717.53476.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031212157.GQ2258@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote: > * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, 20111031 22:17: >> They don't. =A0They use fadvise() which is part of Linux's API much as >> madvise(2) is part of ours. =A0(See the other fork in this thread.) > > Huh? Wait. It seems fadvise() is only a name used by the Linux kernel. > It's not exported by glibc as a symbol. At least not on my laptop > (Ubuntu 11.10). Many developers incorrectly dig into system headers on Linux, so that's probably why they prefix the API. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wTx_71D3L-Nj-c7JM=zTmfq7vZ-_vTBRLArkHfV73RjsA>